truck.stop.

since so much of Brain Computer Interface concerns studying the effects of pulsation and mega hertz on a Proxy's moods and cognitions much of what a Proxy perceives as hearing is only to keep synapses sufficiently engaged for a mapping  and to induce heightened reads during "Chatterbox" processing
a Mentor will often work in tandem with the rhythmic algorithms by engaging A Proxy in simultaneous discourse
in a pre registered "tone"which encourages a Proxy's self to a corresponding "zone of Being", based on previous recorded brainwave response

Since most of this "machinery"s design and intent is to induce  heightened activity in the amygdala  through fear and emotional breakdown and subsequent nurturing  a large portion of the psychotronic "play dates:" are and should be based on a Proxy's  sexual predisposition.

As with all engagements  with A Proxy ,a Mentor's  primary focus  inevitably and rightly goes back to self protection ,as a Proxy's graphs can be cruel and hurtful,"why are you doing this to me?" can only be heard so many times.And often to get back at the Mentor for having so much control of a Proxy will purposely  "toy" or "creep out" the Mandler with activities  the proxy knows  repulse the Mandler...things like pornography and masterbation ,as a Proxy regresses further and further into an almost infantile state ,this activity,if not curtailed can  become a de-stressor,and a weapon,as the Proxy is only too aware that  neural mapping and neural monitoring  must proceed despite the crimes against self being committed.


The Mandler,who must  foremost protect his or her own mind will inevitably devise drastic measures   to get the Proxy to stop such  foul behavior ,for instance over riding the Proxy's visual cortex with directed  images of children's toys 

 ...as the Proxy is aware that his or her readings will indeed be read by magistrate and  may be mistaken as "jacking off" to these "placed"visual overlays ,which might be perceived as  sexual perversion..

But beware Mandler. for while this coercion may seem necessary to curb a Proxy's  self destructive behavior the Mandler must be aware that these associations may cause the Proxy to present as criminal ,as these associations may linger causing the  Proxy to  have heightened brain alteration and feedback if ,for instance the Proxy sees a toy truck or  a child on TV or any sort of childhood recollection 

The proxy  may also assume that these introductions and associations of sexual perversity were perhaps not "to make for a more pleasant work environment for one's Mandler but to deliberately implicate a Proxy as criminal in his  " neural readings.

and do not forget that The Mandler who might initiate a miscorrolation for disciplinary action is not immune to the power of suggestion he has induced into a Proxy's mind set as the "graphed" referential has also been imbued into the Mandler's mind .